Popular Posts:

What’s New:

Can a business invest in stocks?GLEIF’s verifiable LEI issuer qualification programWhat are child entities and how do they relate to other entities?Do I need an LEI when selling shares?Business transparency: How to create an environment of trust?Anti Money Laundering (AML) in banking: Everything you need to knowKYC in banking: Why it’s important and how to comply?What is a parent company and how does it work?How long does it take to get an LEI?ISO 5009 – Identifying organizational rolesISO 17442 – Standard for LEI code structureLegal Entity Identifier (LEI) vs Tax Identification Number (TIN) in IrelandWhat documents are required for LEI in Ireland?Who is an LOU in the LEI dimension?GMEI Utility vs LEI RegisterLapsed LEI – Why should you keep your LEI active?Who is an LEI Registration Agent?Are LEIs public?Can an individual have an LEI?Do LEI numbers need to be renewed?Why is an LEI code required?Who needs an LEI number?How much does an LEI code cost?LEI Lookup – Fully dedicated LEI search websiteISIN to LEI mappingMiFID regulation | MiFID II LEIGLEIF | Global Legal Entity Identifier FoundationOpen LEIWhat is an LEI database?Legal Entity Identifiers for federal agenciesLegal Entity Identifiers in KYCHow to open a business bank account in the UK?Legal Entity Identifiers in digital certificatesBroad adoption of LEIs could save the global banking sector US $2-4 billionThe European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) and Legal Entity Identifiers (LEIs)Adoption of LEI in payment messages by the Payments Market Practice Group (PMPG)Cyber Security in a Nutshell

GLEIF | Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation

What is GLEIF, and when was it founded?


The Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF) was established in June 2014, by the Financial Stability Board. The Regulatory Oversight Committee supports and looks after the foundation, an organization representing public authorities worldwide that has joined to drive transparency within the global financial markets. GLEIFs’ tasks are to support the implementation and use of the Legal Entity Identifier (LEI), a supra-national not-for-profit organization with its headquarters in Switzerland. Along with 15 other Directors, Gerard Hartsink was appointed to be the inaugural chairman of the board.



GLEIF’s role in the LEI dimension


GLEIF is uniquely positioned in the entity identification market, agnostic to any particular political and/or commercial interests. The foundations’ overhaul is to ensure the operational integrity of the Global LEI System. GLEIF is the one behind the continuous improvement of the information available within and the quality of, the LEI data pool. GLEIF makes access to information convenient by making the Global LEI Index obtainable to everyone.

LEI SEARCH 

Global LEI Index is the only worldwide online source providing open, standardized, high-quality legal entity reference data. Through this GLEIF can enable individuals and entities to make smarter, less costly, and more definitive decisions about their possible business partners and clients.

 

GLEIF’s responsibilities are listed on the website.

  • Evaluating the suitability of organizations seeking to operate as issuers of LEIs.
  • Providing expertise and reliability throughout the organization and management of the system.
  • Ensuring access to the complete global LEI data pool, free of charge, to users. 
  • Continuously optimizing the quality of the LEI data pool.
  • Making available comprehensive information on the LEI and the Global LEI System and timely updates on related global developments and GLEIF activities.

For an overview of GLEIF’s services, refer to the GLEIF Service Catalog here.

Thanks to the work of GLEIF, the LEI remains the industry standard best suited to providing open and trustful data for unique legal entity identification management. The foundation has endorsed the International Open Data Charter, aiming to foster greater consistency and collaboration to promote the increased adoption and implementation of shared open data principles, standards, and procedures across sectors globally.


What does the future hold for the LEI system?

Today, LEIs have been assigned to legal entities primarily based in the US and Europe, where regulations now require the use of LEIs to identify counterparties to transactions in regulatory reporting uniquely. In these jurisdictions, public authorities rely on LEI to assess risk, take corrective steps, and, when necessary, control market abuse while improving the integrity of financial data. Therefore, broad LEI adoption will also generate remarkable advantages for the wider business community, by simplifying and globalizing a method of validating organizations and mapping identifiers. On a greater scale, this information can be used to understand organization identity and hierarchy, consequently contributing to newer technological innovations like blockchain.

Banks are a great example of companies that use various identifiers internally to identify the same customer. So do vendors associated with the bank, and LEI has the potential to consolidate many of these inefficiencies.

Taking further the example of a bank, in the future, LEIs will be used to save time onboarding, making processes more efficient and clear – giving confidence to all parties involved. Banks in trade financing could save up to US$500 million per annum overall by using the LEI in the issuance of letters of credit, as well as saving hours and hours in onboarding time.

Furthermore, LEIs help save time and money in the steps taken to complete a digitalized financial transaction. Verification of Identity, invoicing, and signing are just some of the steps involved – this entire order-to-payment process can be streamlined between organizations much more efficiently.

LEIs enable us to immediate, digitized identification of entities and allow banks to drastically cut back the time and other resources spent on background checks and investigation, help to alleviate risk and comply with Anti Money Laundering (AML) regulations,  as well as reduce the instance of false reporting.